Return to Common Sense
July 9, 2014
Section: Domestic - Budget
“The ever expanding budget reflects entitlements on autopilot to bankruptcy, monies for redistribution back to states, and new unfunded programs added every year which will require more than doubling marginal tax rates causing more damage than good to address these shortfalls.”
“The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program.” Ronald Reagan.
Philosophy (Background, Issues, Objectives):
The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 created the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to prepare projections of federal spending "based on the continuation of the existing level of government services."
· In 1985, the Deficit Control Act ensured that spending would be adjusted to keep pace with inflation.
· The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) uses the "current services baseline" and automatically increases the budgets of existing federal agencies every year even if Congress and the Senate do nothing.
The budget process is defined, established by the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, and other budget legislation.
· A budget is commonly seen as an instrument of determining how much to spend, how to allocate limited resources, and how to raise sufficient financing.
· The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) prepares a projection of federal spending for the upcoming fiscal year, based on a continuation of the existing level of governmental services.
· The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) then prepares a five year projection of budget authority, outlays, and revenues, and identify the resulting surplus or deficit.
· The President must submit a budget to Congress each year by the first Monday in February.
· Each year in March, the CBO publishes an analysis of the President's budget proposals.
· The House and Senate Budget Committees each submit a budget resolution by April 1.
· Appropriations committees then put together appropriations bills, considered in the House after May 15.
· Once appropriations committees pass their bills, they are considered by the House and Senate, with a conference committee is typically required to resolve differences between House and Senate bills.
· Once a conference bill has passed both chambers of Congress, it is sent to the President, who may sign the bill or veto.
· Congress has not passed all of the appropriations bills before the start of the fiscal year, so Congress then enacted continuing resolutions to provide for the temporary funding of government operations.
o In 2012, there are twelve appropriations bills which need to be passed:
§ Agriculture, Rural Development, and Food and Drug Administration.
§ Commerce, Justice, and Science.
§ Energy and Water Development.
§ Financial Services and General Government (includes judicial branch, the Executive Office of the President, and District of Columbia appropriations).
§ Homeland Security.
§ Interior and Environment.
§ Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education.
§ Legislative Branch.
§ Military Construction and Veterans Affairs.
§ State and Foreign Operations.
§ Transportation and Housing and Urban Development.
o Multiple bills are sometimes combined into one piece of legislation, such as the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009.
- The Office of Management and Budget reports to the White House and is responsible for the creation and performance of the annual budget.
o The Office of Management and Budget has the mission to oversee agency and regulation performance, but operates on a voluntary basis encouraging use.
o Duplication and waste are not examined since it might require downsizing of individual departments and agencies.
The federal government produces a budget each year that would not pass a public audit.
- The Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996 required the publication of consolidated financial statements using generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and the GAO provide an opinion on their condition.
- The Office of Management and Budget publishes the budget.
o The totals for the current and upcoming fiscal years are only projected amounts.
o Unfunded liabilities such as Medicare, Social Security, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not included in the budget numbers.
- The Government Accountability Office (GAO) oversees the use of public funds.
o Establish accounting standards for the federal government
o Conduct audits of internal controls and financial management.
o Conduct program evaluations and analyses of a broad range of federal activities.
· In 2010 for the 14th year in a row, the U.S. Government was unable to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements because of control weaknesses and other limitations.
Annual governmental budget process is only a spending plan.
- Federal spending has reached $25,000 per household in 2008.
- Budgetary outlays consume almost 24% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2010.
Government spending exceeds 50% of GDP in
Government spending is more than 45% of GDP in
o Excessive government has serious adverse effect: slower growth, higher unemployment, and lower living standards.
o CBO projects federal spending to grow to 40% of GDP due to entitlement growth.
- Total cost of mandatory entitlement spending is projected to leap from 13.4% of GDP in 2010 to 14.1% of GDP by 2020:
o Social Security is projected to expand by 6% annually.
o Medicare is projected to expand by 7% annually.
o Medicaid is projected to expand by 8% annually.
o Net interest spending will consume an additional 9% to 46% of GDP unless programs reined in.
o Increasing marginal tax rates will have to more than double, which is not economically feasible as a solution to these run-away costs.
- Defense spending (20% and recovering).
- “Discretionary” spending (25% with open ended commitments).
- Grants to state and local governments are over $400 billion.
- Earmarks and pork projects are appended to existing legislation to avoid open voting.
- American people understand little of the details, but understand the budget is in trouble.
- Spending determined first, then superficial examination of revenue sources.
There are only two sources of governmental revenue.
- Taxing individuals and businesses.
The federal budget includes a staggering 1,804 subsidy programs, including grants, loans, insurance, scholarships, and other benefits.
· The growth in the number of subsidy programs illustrates the government’s increasing disregard for federalism (the constitutional principle that the federal government ought not to encroach on state, local, and private activities).
· State governments are becoming little more than regional divisions of the national government and nonprofit groups and businesses are becoming tools of the state.
- In 2006 there were 814 federal grant programs for state and local governments.
Government has built and continues to mismanage several major infrastructure programs:
- Government enterprises compete with private alternatives, but are paid for by public funds.
- Public productivity rarely competes favorably vs. private enterprise.
- Amtrak intercity passenger rail service (46 states) with no self supporting routes.
- Federal highway system (47,000 miles) with no self sustaining revenue source.
- Postal Service (50 states) with competition eroding the target customer base.
- High Speed Rail (HSR) for 125mph trains is stealth subsidy for freight haulers.
Internet access is becoming personal and business basic requirement.
- In 2005 74% of Americans, including 94% of computer users, used the Internet
- Cable firms served approximately 60% of broadband subscribers in 2005.
- Satellite, fixed wireless, and broadband over power line technologies also compete for customers
- Deployment of universal broadband connections could create economic benefit of $400 billion a year.
- Online sales totaled $76 billion in 2002, but still only 1.5% of all sales.
- Additional competition in video services could lower cable bills by 15%.
Government programs must each be self sustaining.
- Programs must be periodically examined for effectiveness.
- Spending can only be driven by expected revenue.
The budget process must advance the following governance goals:
- Limiting government to enumerated powers.
- Enhancing Congress’s constitutional fundamental role in budgeting.
- Restoring the balance of powers envisioned in the Constitution.
- Controlling and restraining the Administrative State.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) criteria for “emergency” spending (all five must be met):
- Necessary; (essential or vital, not merely useful or beneficial)
- Sudden; (coming into being quickly, not building up over time)
- Urgent; (requiring immediate action)
- Unforeseen; and
- Not permanent.
Federal government should subsidize interstate infrastructure projects.
- Once infrastructure is constructed, then privatize its operation.
Inter-state wealth redistribution is not a valid purpose for any program.
- If States need money, they can tax their residents directly.
Short Term, Reform federal budget process:
- End baseline budgeting process with automatic annual increases.
- Limit federal government spending to no more than 20% of GDP.
- Require balanced budget within ten years, then annually.
o Institute biennial budgeting and appropriations to restore order to the spending process.
o Enact long term budgets and review at least every five years with triggers or action-forcing devices that automatically make changes when spending exceeds budgeted amounts.
o Deliver annual report to American citizens of the country’s financial condition.
- Comply with GASB 45 to establish an accrual accounting approach to report the cost of benefit as an expense during the years in which the employee is working.
o Include State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) as separate line item.
- Isolate Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid as a separate part of the total budget converting them into regular “discretionary” programs.
- Require the President and the Congress to jointly estimate the amount of revenue they expect will be available as well as the fiscal year's actuarially accrued "non-discretionary" expenses.
o Appropriate truly "non-discretionary" obligations, like Social Security and Medicare, as the first task.
o If appropriations tasks from the previous year have not been completed, no new appropriations should be allowed to ensure that accounting estimates are based on complete and truthful information.
- Include a provision of actuarially prudent reserves for any federal insurance programs or guarantees now in existence or provided at the time Congress creates them in the future.
o Require explicit, current recognition of the future costs for such specialized programs as flood and crop insurance, Export-Import guarantees, and prospective bailouts at the time they are granted rather than the time they are likely to be paid.
- Recognize mandates and their enabling regulations as the responsibility of the federal government and charged to the federal budget.
- Include a complete and objective cost benefit analysis in any healthcare regulations.
- Require adherence to strict rules for use of “emergency” spending.
- GAO should conduct an annual study of duplication in federal spending.
Require Dynamic Analysis to evaluate any new tax policy macroeconomic changes:
- Identify explicit sources of funds for each spending program (or group of programs).
- Limit spending based on projected sources of revenue.
- Recognize future unfunded obligations in program budget estimates.
- Abolish use of budget “trust funds” since funds are virtual and easily diverted to spend on pork projects.
Use Performance Assessment Rating Tool (PART) to evaluate existing program and regulation effectiveness.
- Subject “independent” agencies (ie: FCC, SEC, CFPB, etc.) to executive branch regulatory reviews.
- OMB should subject all major regulations to a benefit-cost analysis before being implemented.
o ExpectMore.Gov developed to monitor program effectiveness.
o Calculate benefits for all new programs, not just “major” (estimated economic impact greater than $100 million; less than 1% of all programs) programs.
o Reduce regulation compliance burden.
- Resurrect the “Byrd Committee,” the Joint Committee on Reduction of Nonessential Federal Expenditures, with subpoena powers to focus on making rescissions in federal spending and requiring an up-and-down vote on the floor.
o Terminate programs and regulations that are ineffective or inefficient
Authorize a Presidential line item veto authority to limit “earmark” and “pork” projects.
- Provide a searchable website showing spending from the Office of Management and Budget.
o Empower taxpayers to monitor federal spending with internet access tools.
- Enact a Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TaBOR) to restrict spending increases.
Require audits of all government departments based on standard private business accounting practices.
- Each department should create a permanent board, whose charter is to search out and identify waste.
- Give each government department independent auditors.
- Compare estimated vs. actual costs for all government programs.
Long Term, Downsize government, with particular emphasis on unsustainable entitlement spending:
- Abolish Cabinet departments not covered under enumerated powers (see individual issue sections with 2010 budgets):
o Department of Agriculture ($142.0 billion annually).
o Department of Commerce ($16.7 billion annually).
§ Abolish business subsidies should be abolished, including technology subsidies, handouts to fishermen, and minority business aid ($1.2 billion).
§ Eliminate Economic Development Administration funding ($469 million).
§ Terminate the International Trade Administration ($389 million).
o Department of Education ($106.9 billion annually).
o Department of Energy ($38.3 billion annually).
o Department of Health and Human Services ($868.8 billion annually).
o Department of Housing and Urban Development ($62.5 billion annually).
§ Privatize Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), ($6.5 B).
§ Privatize Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), ($6.5 B).
§ Privatize Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae).
o Department of Interior (12.0 billion annually).
o Department of Labor (209.3 billion annually).
o Department of Transportation ($90.9 billion annually).
§ Devolve the Federal Highway Administration ($51.8 billion annually) to the states.
§ Devolve the Federal Transit Administration ($15.5 billion annually) to the states.
§ Privatize air traffic control and end airport grants ($14.2 billion annually)
§ Limit Highway Trust Fund spending to level of revenue ($12B).
§ Privatize Federal Aviation Administration ($11.8B).
§ Eliminate the Community Development Block Grant as wasteful and duplicative ($1.6B)
§ Privatize Amtrak ($950M)
§ Eliminate Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) ($800M)
§ Close down Maritime Administration ($325M).
§ Eliminate subsidies to the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ($125M)
§ Terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) program ($100M).
§ Privatize the St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation ($31M).
§ Close down the Appalachian Regional Commission ($3M).
§ Devolve highway infrastructure to the states.
§ Privatize the nation’s airports, while ending federal subsidies.
§ Devolve seaport infrastructure to the states.
- Privatize major entitlement programs into personal accounts:
o Medicare (325B) - Privatize into Personal Health Savings Accounts.
o Social Security - Privatize into personal accounts.
- Devolve entitlement programs back to the states:
o Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit ($62B)
o Medicaid ($186B)
o State Payment for Family Support ($4.1B).
o Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ($18.1B)
- Privatize activities that could be performed better by the private sector:
o Army Corps of Engineers ($4.9B).
§ Dams ($10.0B).
§ Energy Facilities ($10.0B).
o Export-Import Bank.
o Geographic Survey ($.5B).
o Global Positioning Service ($7.0B).
o Government Printing Office.
o Legal Services Corporation ($350 M).
o NASA ($15.7B).
o National Weather Service ($2.3B).
o Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation.
o Privatize the Postal Service ($8.1B).
o Retirement Insurance, including Social Security ($527B).
o Risk Management Agency ($3.4B).
o Transportation Security Agency ($2.7B).
- Sell off excess federal assets:
o Excess electromagnetic spectrum ($150B).
o Commodity lands (Forest Service, BLM) ($160B).
o Government buildings and lands ($10.B).
- Privatize federal insurance programs since the government has no Constitutional role providing or guaranteeing insurance coverage:
o Crop Insurance.
o Flood Insurance.
o Property Insurance.
o Terrorism Risk Insurance (TRIA).
o Windstorm Insurance.
- Devolve local programs back to the states:
o Child Care Entitlement Grants ($2.7B).
o Child Care & Development Grants ($2.1B).
o Community Oriented Policing Services ($575M).
o Community Service Grants ($631M)
o Environmental Protection Agency ($3.6B).
o Federal Transit Administration ($8.4B).
o Foster Care & Adoption Grants ($6.5B).
o Head Start ($6.8B).
o Social Service Grants ($1.8B).
- Terminate corporate welfare and other mis-targeted programs:
o Administration on Aging ($1.4B).
o Employment and Training Administration ($5.2B).
o Low Income Home Energy Assistance ($2.1B).
o Small Business Administration ($3.0B).
o Substance Abuse & Mental Health ($3.2B).
o Trade Adjustment Assistance ($1.1B).
- Terminate failed, outdated, and irrelevant programs:
o Agency for International Development ($3.7B).
o Corporation for Public Broadcasting ($466M).
o Economic Development Administration ($392M).
o Maritime Administration ($411M).
o National Endowment for the Arts & Humanities ($254M).
o Rural Development ($1.0B).
o United Nations ($362M).
- Consolidate duplicative and contradictory programs:
o At-risk youth.
o Early childhood development.
o Economic development.
o Homeless assistance.
o International education.
o Safe water.
- Sunset programs, rather than trimming them or phasing them out.
Subsidize building Internet of the future across U.S.A. to provide universal wireless broadband access.
- Ban Internet access services taxes (federal, state, and local).
- Limit video franchising regulation.
“The Wealth of Nations” by Adam Smith, 1776.
“Policy Recommendations for the 105th Congress” published by CATO Institute, 1997.
“Downsizing the Federal Government” by Chris Edwards published by CATO Institute, 2005.
“The Debt Bomb” by Tom A. Coburn published by Thomas Nelson, 2012.
“The Liberty Amendments” by Mark R. Levin published by Threshold Editions, 2013.
Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) tracks waste, mismanagement, and inefficiency in the federal government and publishes at http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer .
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) ExpectMore.gov at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/expectmore/ .
“Tech, Telecom, and Internet – General Principles” published by The Cato Institute at http://www.cato.org/tech/genprinciples.html .
the Postal Service” by Edward Hudgins dated
“Corporate Welfare Update” by Chris Edwards and Tad DeHaven dated May 2002 published by The Cato Institute at http://www.cato.org/pubs/tbb/tbb-0205-7.pdf .
“Government Schemes Cost More Than Promised” by Chris Edwards dated September 2003 published by The Cato Institute at http://www.cato.org/pubs/tbb/tbb-0309-17.pdf .
Get Federal Spending Under Control” by Brian M. Riedl
“Four Principles of Budget Process Reform” by Brian M. Riedl and Alison Fraser dated April 8, 2004 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2004/04/Four-Principles-of-Budget-Process-Reform .
“Federal Aid to the States Ripe for Cuts” by Chris Edwards dated May 2004 published by The Cato Institute at http://www.cato.org/pubs/tbb/tbb-0405-20.pdf .
“Broadband by 2007: A Look at the President’s Internet Initiative” by James L. Gattuso, John M Kneuer, David McIntosh, Harold Furchtgott-Roth, and Peter Pitsch dated May 13, 2004 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/upload/71075_1.pdf .
the Federal Government” by Chris Edwards dated
“Time for the Federal Budget to Include Unfunded Entitlement Obligations” by Alison Acosta Fraser dated February 3, 2005 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2005/02/Time-for-the-Federal-Budget-Process-to-Include-Unfunded-Entitlement-Obligations .
“Performance-Based Decisions in the President’s 2006 Budget” by Keith Miller and Alison Acosta Fraser dated March 17, 2005 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2005/03/Performance-Based-Decisions-in-the-Presidents-2006-Budget .
“Time to Pull the Plug on Federally Subsidized Electricity” by Ben Lieberman dated November 7, 2005 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/search?query=time+to+pull+the+plug+on+federally+subsidized+electricity+lieberman .
“Privatize Fannie and Freddie” by Mallory Factor dated November 11, 2005 published by National Review Online at http://old.nationalreview.com/nrof_comment/factor200511110824.asp .
“The Terror of TRIA” by Paul J. Gessing dated December 7, 2005 published by National review Online at http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/216181/terror-tria/paul-j-gessing .
“Six Budget Reforms to Restrain Lobbyists and Special Interests” by Brian M. Riedl dated January 25, 2006 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2006/01/Six-Budget-Reforms-to-Restrain-Lobbyists-and-Special-Interests .
“The Bush Budget’s Hidden Gold: Dynamic Scoring Comes to the Treasury” by William W. Beach dated February 9, 2006 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2006/02/The-Bush-Budgets-Hidden-Gold-Dynamic-Scoring-Comes-to-the-Treasury?query=The+Bush+Budget%27s+Hidden+Gold:+Dynamic+Scoring+Comes+to+theTreasury .
“A Responsible Budget Resolution in Three Easy Pieces” by Brian M. Riedl dated March 23, 2006 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2006/03/A-Responsible-Budget-Resolution-in-Three-Easy-Pieces .
“Past Trends and Future Troubles in Federal Spending: A Look at the Federal Budget Chart Book” by Rea S. Hederson, Jr., Alison Acosta Fraser, and Michelle Muccio dated May 30, 2006 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2006/05/Past-Trends-and-Future-Troubles-in-Federal-Spending-A-Look-at-the-Federal-Budget-Chart-Book .
“Comprehensive Budget Reform: The Need Has Never Been Greater” by Paul Ryan dated June 6, 2006 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Lecture/Comprehensive-Budget-Reform-The-Need-Has-Never-Been-Greater .
“House Appropriators’ PART Prohibition Perpetuates Wasteful Spending” by Michelle Muccio and Allison Acosta Fraser dated June 20, 2006 published by The Heritage Foundation on http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/wm1137.cfm .
Budget Should Include Long-Term Obligations from Entitlement Programs”
by Allison Acosta Fraser dated
Price Government?” by Ernest S. Christian and Gary A. Robbins dated
“A good way to beat traffic: Lease major toll roads” dated July 4, 2006 published by USA Today at http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-07-04-our-toll-roads_x.htm .
Elements of a Successful Government Waste Commission” by Michelle Muccio and Brian M. Riedl dated
Improve Government Waste Commission Proposals” by Brian M. Riedl and Michelle Muccio dated
“Empowering Citizens to Monitor Federal Spending” by Chris Edwards dated July 2006 published by The Cato Institute at http://www.cato.org/pubs/tbb/tbb_0718-38.pdf .
the Senate Raid the Treasury for Amtrak?” by Ronald D. Utt dated
Aboard Fiscal Conservatism” by Joseph Vranich
“Number of Federal Subsidy Programs is Soaring” by Chris Edwards dated October 2006 published by The Cato Institute at http://www.cato.org/pubs/tbb/tbb_0611-41.pdf .
Policy Lessons from
Analysis at Treasury: What Arne the Next Steps?” by Tracy L. Foertsch dated
debts and deficits” by Bruce Bartlett dated
“Understanding Public Attitudes about Federal Budget” by Alison Kadlec and Will Friedman dated December 2006 published by Public Agenda at http://www.publicagenda.org/research/pdfs/understanding_public_attitudes_about_the_federal_budget.pdf .
Reform Without a Tax Hike” by Peter Ferrara dated
“The Republican Study Committee’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights: Making Federal Budget Accountability a Reality” by Nicola Moore and Alison Acosta Fraser dated March 14, 2007 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/wm1394.cfm .
“A Fiscal Wake-up Call” dated March 2007 published by The Concord Coalition at http://www.concordcoalition.org/events/fiscal-wake-up/fiscal-wake-up-call.htm .
Taxpayers the Spending” by Phil Kerpen
the Point” by John Fund dated
Triple Threat” by Cesar Conda dated
the Year’s Privatization Trends” by Leonard C. Gilroy dated
Spending: Past Abuse Is No Excuse for Today’s Excess” by Ernest
Istook Jr. dated
the Swamp” dated
to Somewhere” dated
“The New Privatization” by Steven Malanga dated Summer 2007 published by City Journal at http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_3_privatization.html .
“’Starve the Beast’ Origins and Development of a Budgetary Metaphor” by Bruce Bartlett dated Summer 2007 published by The Independent Review at http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_12_01_01_bartlett.pdf .
“Fixing Flood Insurance Before the Next Disaster: House Bill Takes Several Steps in the Wrong Direction” by David C. John dated September 27, 2007 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/wm1645.cfm .
“South Carolina’s Omnibus Coastal Insurance Reform Legislation” by Eli Lehrer dated October 2007 published by Competitive Enterprise Institute at http://www.cei.org/pdf/6201.pdf .
view on catastrophic coverage: When the government sells insurance, everybody
“What’s Left for Government to Do?” by Stephen Goldsmith dated January/February 2008 published by The American Magazine at http://www.american.com/archive/2008/january-february-magazine-contents/what2019s-left-for-government-to-do .
the Bottom Line” by Jeff Sessions and Johnny Isakson dated
Privatization of Public Services” by John Chapman dated
“Entitlements Digging U.S. Fiscal Grave” dated March 5, 2008 published by The Minyanville Gazette at http://www.minyanville.com/articles/index/a/16155 .
Back Our Fiscal Future” by Stuart M. Butler, Allison Acosta Fraser,
and others dated
Funds and State Fiscal
Reform, Not Tax Increases” by Peter Ferrara dated
Fund” by John Berlau dated
“Swimming in Subsidies” by Eli Lehrer dated June 26, 2008 published by National Review Online at http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDM3NjQ1MzhmZTY4ODlmNTM0N2RlYjRjOGU3MjRiNWU= .
Warning on Raising Taxes to Pay for Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security”
by Stuart M. Butler dated
Not a Model Railroad” by Douglas Stone dated
and the Economy” by Randall Hoven dated
Government Spending Does Not Stimulate Economic Growth” by Brian M. Riedl dated
“Jumping Off the Government Bridge” by Peter Van Doren and Chris Edwards dated December 9, 2008 published by National Review Online at http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NzNlODhhOTM5OTQ0OTNiNzNlZmJjNWFmZmMwZTczNzA= .
“U.S. Government’s 2008 Financial report: Demonstrates Significant Problems” dated December 15, 2008 published by Government Accountability Office at http://www.gao.gov/press/financialreport20081215.pdf .
“Fiscal Federalism” by Chris Edwards dated February 2009 published by The CATO Institute at http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/fiscal-federalism .
“All Aboard the Gravy Train” by Chris Edwards dated April 15, 2009 published by National Review Online at http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ODZmNTg2ZWUyMTA1ZDU5N2MyYzhkNjFjZWMyZGI5NTc= .
“Insurance Against Terrorism” by Eli Lehrer dated August 10, 2009 published by The Weekly Standard at http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/796qucel.asp .
“Privatizing Fannie, Freddie Could ‘Mitigate’ Risks Caused by Government Intervention, Says GAO” by Matt Cover dated September 15, 2009 published by Cybercast News Service at http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54021 .
“Will Obama’s High-Speed Rail Plan Become a Subsidy for Freight Railroads?” by Ronald D. Utt dated October 1, 2009 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/SmartGrowth/wm2637.cfm .
“50 Examples of Government Waste” by Brian M. Riedl dated October 6, 2009 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2009/10/50-examples-of-government-waste .
“Taxpayers Deserve an Annual Report to the Shareholders” by Carl Paulus dated February 5, 2010 published by American Thinker at http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/taxpayers_deserve_an_annual_re.html .
“The Dead Shall Be Raised: The Future of Fannie and Freddie” by Peter J. Wallison dated February 12, 2010 published by American Enterprise Institute at http://www.aei.org/outlook/100938 .
“Recovery via Spending Cuts, Low Taxes, and Cheaper Government” by Jeffrey L. Scribner dated February 23, 2010 published by American Thinker at http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/recovery_via_spending_cuts_low.html .
“How to Cut the Budget” by Christopher Chantrill dated February 23, 2010 published by American Thinker at http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/how_to_cut_the_budget.html .
“The Three Biggest Myths About Tax Cuts and the Budget Deficit” by Brian M. Riedl dated June 21, 2010 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/06/The-Three-Biggest-Myths-About-Tax-Cuts-and-the-Budget-Deficit .
“Department of Commerce Proposed Spending Cuts” by Chris Edwards and Tad DeHaven dated May 2010 published by Downsizing Government at http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/commerce/proposed-cuts .
“Department of Transportation Proposed Spending Cuts” by Chris Edwards dated June 2010 published by Downsizing Government at http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/transportation/spending-cuts .
“Restoring the U.S. to a Free Economy” dated August 17, 2010 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/08/Restoring-the-US-to-a-Free-Economy .
“Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending” by Grover Norquist dated August 18, 2010 published by Americans for Tax Reform at http://www.atr.org/files/files/081810pr_14_Specific_Spending_Reduction_Ideas%281%29.pdf .
“What Every American Needs to Know about Government-Entitlement Reform” by Andrew G. Biggs dated September 16, 2010 published by American Enterprise Institute at http://www.aei.org/outlook/100991 .
“Postal Bankruptcy” by Doug Bandow dated October 5, 2010 published by The American Spectator at http://spectator.org/archives/2010/10/05/postal-bankruptcy .
“A Plan to End Failed Federal Programs” by Darrell Issa dated October 13, 2010 published by Investor’s Business Daily at http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/550274/201010131830/A-Plan-To-End-Failed-Federal-Programs.htm .
“Budget Outlays for 12 of 15 Cabinet Level Federal Departments Have Dramatically Expanded Since Dems Took Control of Congress” by Chris Johnson dated October 26, 2010 published by Cybercast News Service at http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/budget-outlays-every-cabinet-department .
“How to Cut $343 Billion from the Federal Budget” by Brian M. Riedl dated October 28, 2010 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/10/How-to-Cut-343-Billion-from-the-Federal-Budget .
“Privatizing the U.S. Postal Service” by Tad DeHaven dated November 2010 published by CATO Institute at http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/usps .
“CBO: Full Privatization of Fannie, Freddie May be Best Option” by Matt Cover dated January 11, 2011 published by Cybercast News Service at http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/cbo-full-privatization-fannie-freddie-ma .
“Uncle Sam’s Dangerous Deterioration” by Tom Blumer dated January 26, 2011 published by Pajamas Media at http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/uncle-sams-dangerous-deterioration/ .
“Sen. Paul Proposes Serious Cuts” by Chris Edwards dated January 31, 2011 published by Cato Institute at http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/sen-rand-paul-proposes-serious-cuts .
“No Reservations: The Case for Dismantling the Indian Bureaucracy” by Carl Horowitz dated February 4, 2011 published by Town Hall at http://townhall.com/columnists/CarlHorowitz/2011/02/04/no_reservations__the_case_for_dismantling_the_indian_bureaucracy .
“What We’re Talking About When We Talk About Big Government” by David Steinberg dated March 7, 2011 published by Pajamas Media at http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-we%E2%80%99re-talking-about-when-we-talk-about-big-government/ .
“Taking the Government Out of Housing Finance: Principles for Reforming the Housing Finance Market” by Peter J. Wallison, Edward Pinto, and Alex J. Pollock dated March 24, 2011 published by American Enterprise Institute at http://www.aei.org/paper/100206 .
“Budget Cuts look Familiar?” by Chris Edwards dated April 19, 2011 published by Cato Institute at http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/budget-cuts-look-familiar .
“EDA and the Cookie Monsters” dated June 8, 2011 published by National Review Online at http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/269083/eda-and-cookie-monsters-editors .
“Considering a Balanced Budget Amendment: Lessons from History” by Ernest J. Istook, Jr. dated July 14, 2011 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/07/Considering-a-Balanced-Budget-Amendment-Lessons-from-History .
“Truthful Accounting Should Be the First objective of Any Debt Ceiling Compromise” by Sheila Weinberg and Ralf Seiffe dated July 28, 2011 published by American Thinker at http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/truthful_accounting_should_be_the_first_objective_of_any_debt_ceiling_compromise.html .
“Time to End the U.S. Debt Accelerator Baseline Budgeting” by Terry Paulson dated May 7, 2012 published by Town Hall at http://townhall.com/columnists/terrypaulson/2012/05/07/time_to_end_the_us_debt_accelerator_baseline_budgeting .
“CBO Report Echoes Trustees on Medicare, Social Security” by Romina Boccia dated June 14, 2012 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/06/cbo-long-term-budget-outlook-on-the-nations-fiscal-future .
“Stop the Menendez-Boxer Sideshow: End Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Now” by David C. John dated November 27, 2012 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/11/end-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-now-menendez-boxer-bill-not-the-solution .
“A Housing Market Free of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: The Economic Effects of Eliminating Government-Sponsored Enterprises in Housing” by John L. Ligon and William W. Beach dated January 8, 2013 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/01/a-housing-market-free-of-fannie-mae-freddie-mac .
“Get the Feds Out of Infrastructure” by Chris Edwards dated February 5, 2013 published by National Review Online at http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/339767/get-feds-out-infrastructure-chris-edwards .
“How to Cut $30 Billion More from the THUD Bill” by Emily Goff dated July 1, 2013 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/07/how-to-cut-from-transportation-housing-and-urban-development-appropriations .
“Congress Could Cut Five USDA Programs and Save $2.8 Billion a Year” by Daren Bakst and Romina Boccia dated July 2, 2013 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/07/congress-could-cut-five-usda-programs-and-save-28-billion-a-year .
“Why Congress Needs a New Budget Process” by Patrick Louis Knudsen dated December 5, 2013 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/12/why-congress-needs-a-new-budget-process .
“The Best Way to Cut Spending: Cut Spending” by Matt Purple dated December 18, 2013 published by The American Spectator at http://spectator.org/articles/57165/best-way-cut-spending-cut-spending .
“10 Programs to Eliminate in the January 2014 Spending Bill and Save $10.2 Billion” by Romina Boccia dated January 3, 2014 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/01/10-programs-to-eliminate-in-the-january-2014-spending-billand-save-102-billion .
“GSE Reform: The Economic Effects of Eliminating a Government Guarantee in Housing Finance” by John L. Ligon and Norbert J. Michel dated February 7, 2014 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/02/gse-reform-the-economic-effects-of-eliminating-a-government-guarantee-in-housing-finance?utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=headline140210 .
“Red Tape Rising: Five Years of Regulatory Expansion” by James L. Gattuso and Diane Katz dated March 26, 2014 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/03/red-tape-rising-five-years-of-regulatory-expansion?utm_source .
“A Plan to Cut Federal Spending” by Chris Edwards dated May 2014 published by CATO Institute at http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/plan-to-cut-federal-spending .