Crime
Return to Common Sense
May 28, 2010
Section:
Domestic – Crime
“Swift, sure, and
blind justice has increased prison populations and consequently lowered crime
rates.”
Philosophy
(Background, Issues, Objectives):
Laws are selectively enforced.
- Speed limits are perfect example of selective enforcement.
- Punishment is inconsistent, geographically and economically.
- Higher class and politicians are frequently given a pass on first criminal
offense.
- “Mental” (ex: hate) crimes
increase punishment, but not effective (hard to prove mental motivation).
o
“Thought
police” seeks to criminalize thought and non politically correct
thinking.
o
Hate crimes establish unfair, two tiered justice
system, favoring one type of victim over others.
There are four justifications for criminal sanctions (punishment):
·
Deterrence
- seeks to
make crime more costly; deter from committing crime and criminals from
recidivism.
·
Incapacitation
- removes the
offender from society; reducing crime is most important.
·
Rehabilitation
- assumes
crime is determined by social forces and not the decisions of criminals; criminals
must be retrained, not punished.
·
Retribution
(Just deserts) - asserts
that punishments should be commensurate with the moral gravity of offenses;
level of punishment determined by seriousness of crime.
Restitution is associated with the civil
courts.
- Restitution is based on restoring lost compensation.
Capital punishment is criminal justice,
not revenge.
·
A society that honors the sanctity of life by
putting to death those who are destroyers of life is not murderous but Godly.
·
Number of executions has decreased since 1999.
·
Gallup poll found 69% of Americans favor the death
penalty.
·
States that reinstituted death penalty after 1976
collectively saw a significantly bigger drop in murder rates by 1998.
o Studies
found that each execution saved the lives of about 15 to 18 potential murder
victims.
o 75%
studies by economists find that executions reduce murder, accounting for 12% to
14% drop in murders.
Department of Justice statistics document
crime is skewed by race.
·
Between 1976 and 2005 blacks have been killing
other people 6-9 times higher than comparable homicide rates for whites and
Hispanics combined.
o From
1976 to 2005 blacks committed more than 52% of all murders in America.
·
Blacks constituted 39.3% of all violent crime
arrests, including 56.3% of all robberies.
·
In New York violent crime is 13 times more likely
to be perpetrated by a black than be a white.
·
The
most exhaustive, best designed study found that the severity of
offenders’ sentences depended heavily on such factors as prior criminal
records, the seriousness of the crimes, and whether guns were used in the
commission of those crimes.
·
Race
was found to have no effect whatsoever.
·
Study
results contradicted conclusions drawn from an earlier study that had not taken
prior convictions and the use of firearms into account.
·
Black
overrepresentation is almost entirely at the arrest stage, reflecting the
simple fact that the “average” black breaks the law more frequently
than the “average” white.
·
In studies that consider all relevant variables, such as the
defendant’s prior criminal record, the severity of the crime in question,
the offender’s demeanor with police, whether a weapon was used, and whether
the crime in question was victim-precipitated, no differences have been found
in sentencing patterns, either in relation to the victim’s race or the
offender’s race.
o
In
1983, the liberal-leaning National Academy of Sciences found “no evidence
of a widespread systematic pattern of discrimination in sentencing.”
o
In
1985, the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology concluded that a
disproportionate number of blacks were in prison not because of a double
standard of justice, but because of the disproportionate number of crimes they
committed.
o
In
1985, federal government statistician Patrick Langan
conducted an exhaustive study of black and white incarceration rates and found
that “even if racism [in sentencing] exists, it might help explain only a
small part of the gap between the 11 percent black representation in the United
States adult population and the now nearly 50 percent black representation
among persons entering state prisons each year in the United States.”
o
In
a 1987 review essay of the three most comprehensive books examining the role of
race in the American criminal-justice system, the journal Criminology
concluded that there was little evidence of anti-black discrimination.
o
A
1991 Rand Corporation study found that a defendant’s racial or ethnic
group affiliation bore little or no relationship to conviction rates; far more
important than race were such factors as the amount of evidence against the
defendant, and whether or not a credible eyewitness testified.
o
The
1991 Rand study also found almost no relation between a defendant’s race
or ethnicity and his or her likelihood of receiving a severe sentence.
o
A
1993 study by the National Academy of Sciences agreed that race had a
negligible effect on sentencing.
o
Also
in 1993, a study of federal sentencing guidelines found no evidence of racially
disparate punishments for perpetrators of similar offenses.
o
The
seriousness of the crime, the offender’s prior criminal record, and
whether weapons were used accounted for all the observed interracial variations
of prison sentences.
o
In
1995, Patrick Langan analyzed data on 42,500
defendants in America’s 75 largest counties and found “no evidence
that in the places where blacks in the United States have most of their
contacts with the justice system, that system treats them more harshly than
whites.”
o
A
1996 analysis of 55,000 big-city felony cases found that black defendants were
convicted at a lower rate than whites in 12 of the 14 federally designated
felony categories.
o
Liberal
criminologist Michael Tonry wrote in his 1996 book Malign
Neglect: “Racial differences in patterns of offending, not racial
bias by police and other officials, are the principal reason that such greater
proportions of blacks than whites are arrested, prosecuted, convicted and
imprisoned.”
o In 1997, the following year, liberal criminologists
Robert Sampson and Janet Lauritsen concurred that
“large racial differences in criminal offending,” not racism,
accounted for the fact that blacks were likelier than whites to be in prison
and serving longer terms.
·
This
finding is consistent with the overwhelming consensus of other recent studies,
most of which indicate that black defendants are slightly less likely to be
convicted of criminal charges against them that white defendants.
Criminal system over protects the
criminal.
- Profiling criminals is a valid police approach for rapid apprehension.
- Evidence rules impede law enforcement.
- Crime rate decreased corresponding to increased incarceration.
U.S. has highest adult imprisonment rate.
- Prisoners forfeit rights, such as voting, as condition of
imprisonment.
- High percentage of black males (1 in every 6) & Hispanic males
(1 in every 13); White males (1 in every 38).
o In
2006 37.5% of all state and federal prisoners were black.
o In
2006 one in 33 black men were in prison.
o 11%
of all black males between the ages of 20 and 34 are in prison or jail.
- Women incarceration rates recently doubled to 1.8% (compared to
overall male likelihood of 11.3%)
- Recidivism remains high (2/3 rearrested within 3 years) for most
crimes.
Prisons are being used to recruit Islamic
terrorists.
- An estimated 2 million people are imprisoned in the U.S., 6% of
them are Muslims.
- An estimated 9,000 prison inmates want Islamic services.
- Radical imams in New York have espoused violent views, and war on
non-Muslims.
Principles:
Laws can and do legislate morality.
- Judeo Christian morality is basis for many laws.
- Victim justice is ultimate goal.
Recommendations:
Enforce or erase all laws, awarding
uniform sentences.
- Enforce swift and sure capital punishment for most heinous crimes.
- Revoke “hate crimes” provisions as
unneeded, unenforceable thought control.
- Decriminalize socially and economically productive conduct.
- Lower legal drinking age to 18.
Return pendulum to favor victim rights
over criminal rights.
- Endorse “criminal profiling” as valid law enforcement
approach.
- Revoke driver’s license for repeat DWI offenders.
- Increase length of punishment for repeat offenders.
- Continue trend of keeping violent criminals incarcerated.
- Provide some form of restitution, as part of judgment, to the
victim or victim’s family.
Privatize prisons to outsource
incarceration services.
- Set federal, state, and local incarceration standards and
practices.
- Ensure crime is punished and justice is served.
- Encourage prisoner paid participation in free market enterprise
ventures.
Return state and local laws primacy
on:
- Abortion application.
- Drug enforcement.
- Juvenile delinquency.
- Gang activity.
End DOJ law enforcement grants that subsidize
routine local law enforcement activities.
- End ineffective Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grants.
- End ineffective Youth PROMISE grants.
References:
“Thou Shalt Not Kill – A Convicted Murderer?” by
Steve Farrell dated August 27, 2001 published by News Max at http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/5/30/215138.shtml .
“The
Racial Profiling Myth Debunked” by Heather MacDonald dated Spring 2002 published by City Journal on http://www.city-journal.org/html/12_2_the_racial_profiling.html .
“Under
Color of Law” by Lowell Ponte dated August 20, 2003 published by
Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=9462 .
“Criminals
Owe Debt to Victims, Not Society” by Wendy McElroy dated December 30,
2003 published by Independent Institute at http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1459 .
“A
Conservative Case for Capital Punishment” by Steve Farrell dated
March 18, 2005 published by News Max at http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/3/17/143817.shtml .
“’Thou
Shalt Not Kill’ – A Convicted
Murderer?” by Steve Farrell dated May 31, 2006 published by News Max
at http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/5/30/215138.shtml .
“Study:
Prison Used to Recruit Terrorists” dated September 20, 2006 published
by News Max at http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/9/20/212935.shtml .
“Another
Argument for Capital Punishment” by Dennis Prager
dated December 12, 2006 published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=25957 .
“Violence
Vanquished” by Janice Shaw Crouse dated January 25, 2007 published by
Human Events Online at http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=19145 .
“Drug
War Victories” by Robert J. Caldwell dated January 29, 2007 published
by Human Events Online at http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=19177 .
“Big,
Big Government” by John Stossel dated
January 31, 2007 published by Human Events Online at http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=19216 .
“Irrational
Sentencing, Top to Bottom” by Stuart Taylor, Jr. dated February 12,
2007 published by National Journal at http://nationaljournal.com/scripts/printpage.cgi?/taylor.htm .
“Changing
Crime Rates: Ineffective Law Enforcement Grants and the Prison Buildup”
by David B. Muhlhausen dated February 12, 2007
published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Crime/wm1355.cfm .
“Do We
Have a Right to Hate?” by Selwyn Duke dated February 22, 2007
published by Intellectual Conservative at http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/do-we-have-a-right-to-hate/ .
“Federal
Law Enforcement Grants and Crime Rates: No Connection Except for Waste and
Abuse” by David B. Muhlhausen and Erica Little dated March 14, 2007 published by The Heritage Foundation
at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Crime/bg2015.cfm .
“The
Case Against 21” by John J. Miller dated April 19, 2007 published by
National Review Online at http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YzU4NTcwMTQ4NTBmYzVlNWMzZjgwYTRjYjgyMzllMjg= .
“Studies:
Death Penalty Deters Crime” dated June 10, 2007 published by News Max
at http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/6/10/212452.shtml?s=ic .
“Narco-Insurrection”
by Ralph Peters dated August 9, 2007 published by New York Post at http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/08092007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/narco_insurrection_opedcolumnists_ralph_peters.htm .
“The
Ignored Amendment” by Ralph R. Reiland
dated August 29, 2007 published by The American Spectator at http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=11941 .
“The
Return of the Thought Police” by Wendy Kaminer
dated October 28, 2007 published by Wall Street Journal Opinion Journal at http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010792 “Death Penalty’s Deadly Vacation”
by John R. Lott Jr. dated November 2, 2007 published by New York Post at http://www.nypost.com/seven/11022007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/death_penaltys_deadly_vacation_308016.htm .
“ACLU,
Muslim Groups Resist Anti-terror Measures Again” by Robert Spencer
dated November 12, 2007 published by Human Events Online at http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=23371 .
“The
Perils of Non-Executions” by Aaron J. Veselenak
dated November 17, 2007 published by Intellectual Conservative at http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/11/17/the-peril-of-non-executions/ .
“Facts
Back Up Death Penalty’s Effectiveness” by John R. Lott Jr.
dated December 19, 2007 published by Investor’s Business Daily at http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=282952624388536 .
“Why
Would Anyone Support the Death Penalty - Part I” by Andrew Tallman
dated January 25, 2008 published by Town Hall at http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AndrewTallman/2008/01/25/why_would_anyone_support_the_death_penalty_part_i .
“Why
Would Anyone Support the Death Penalty – Part II” by Andrew
Tallman dated January 29, 2008 published by Town Hall at http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AndrewTallman/2008/01/29/why_would_anyone_support_capital_punishment_part_ii .
“High
Incarceration Rate of Blacks is Function of Crime, Not Racism” by
Heather MacDonald dated April 28, 2008 published by Investor’s Business
Daily at http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=294274911882475 .
“Brain
Functioning Skewed by Race” by Takuan Seiyo
dated June 11, 2008 published by Intellectual Conservative at http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/06/11/brain-functioning-skewed-by-race/ .
“MADD
Logic” by Jacob Sullum dated August 27,
2008 published by Town Hall at http://townhall.com/columnists/JacobSullum/2008/08/27/madd_logic .
“Barack
Obama: Tilting at Racial Windmills” by John Perazzo
dated December 16, 2008 published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=26ADACFB-5F2F-4C7D-9DEF-8989382DE4B7 .
“All
Crimes Are Hate Crimes” by J. Matt Barber dated May 21, 2009
published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34945 .
“The
Youth PROMISE Act: Outside the Scope and Expertise of the Federal Government”
by David B. Mulhausen dated August 5, 2009 published
by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Crime/tst080509a.cfm .
“Bigot
Bonus” by Jacob Sullum dated October 14,
2009 published by Reason Magazine at http://reason.com/archives/2009/10/14/bigot-bonus .
“Theories
of Punishment and Mandatory Minimum Sentences” by David Muhlhausen dated May 27, 2010 published by The Heritage Foundation
at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Testimony/Theories-of-Punishment-and-Mandatory-Minimum-Sentences
.