Return to Common Sense
July 10, 2013
Section: Domestic – Energy
“The obstacles to rational power generation in this country are political, not scientific or technical, so it is time to prioritize energy independence ahead of dubious and unaffordable environmental junk science to increase our petroleum supplies exploiting our extensive oil reserves and building new nuclear plants.”
“The best answer, while conservation is worthy in itself, is to try to make us independent of outside sources to the greatest extent possible for our energy.” Ronald Reagan.
Philosophy (Background, Issues, Objectives):
Government oversees energy supply and demand.
- Department of Energy, created in 1974, oversees US energy supply and demand.
o Energy Security.
o Nuclear security.
o Scientific Discovery and innovation.
o Environmental Responsibility.
o Management Excellence.
- Eleven government departments and agencies operate a total of 94 programs to encourage clean energy projects and research in private sector buildings.
- The Department of Energy runs six separate programs to research ways to make commercial and residential programs more energy-efficient.
- The Defense Department operates its own program called the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program to research and develop military-related environmentally-friendly technologies.
- In all, 83 of these programs target energy conservation in some way, 60 focus on indoor air quality, and 51 encourage water conservation.
- Regulatory and environmental policy restrictions limited energy exploration and refining ability.
- Energy consumption is expected to increase more rapidly than domestic energy supply through 2025.
Energy production has a number of sources, each with its own infrastructure requirements.
- Until 1974 the United States was both the world’s biggest consumer and producer of crude oil.
o In 2010, the U.S. produces about half the oil it did in 1971.
- Approximately 6-8 trillion barrels each of conventional and unconventional oil resources exist.
o Globe has consumed only one in a grand total of 12 to 16 trillion barrels underground.
o Industry recovers an average of only 1 out of 3 barrels of conventional resources underground.
§ A 10% gain in extraction efficiency on a global scale will unlock 1.2 to 1.6 trillion barrels of extra resource – an additional 50 year supply at current consumption rates.
o Unconventional sources include shale oil, tar sands, extra heavy oil.
§ There are about 3 trillion barrels of oil equivalent in the shale formations in the western U.S., about equal to the entire world’s proven oil reserves.
§ Shale gas has been found mostly on private and state land.
§ Shale oil, on the other hand, has been found on federal land, requiring laborious federal permit applications.
o Industry recovers much less than 1 out of 3 barrels of unconventional resources.
o The untapped reserves are estimated up to 2.3 Trillion barrels, nearly three times the reserves held by the OPEC countries and sufficient to meet 300 years of demand, at today's levels -- for auto, truck, aircraft, heating and industrial fuel, without importing a single barrel of oil.
§ The Bakken Fields in North and South Dakota - New drilling and oil recovery technology is making the capture of this oil feasible and some development is now underway. It is estimated that there is at least 200 Billion barrels of oil in this region. At a price of $100 per barrel the value of this find is $20 Trillion.
§ The Outer Continental shelf - It is estimated that around 90 billion barrels of oil sit beneath the ocean bed 50 to 100 miles off the shore of the Atlantic, Pacific and Gulf coasts. The value: $9 Trillion.
§ The Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) -About 10 billion barrels are locked up here with a current value of $1 Trillion.
§ Tar Sands - Around 75 Billion barrels of oil could come from these areas which are similar to the Canadian tar sand fields and which now produce about 2 million barrels per day. The value: $7.5 Trillion
§ Oil Shale - This is the most massive area of potential oil production in the world with an estimated 1.5 Trillion barrel potential. The technology necessary to extract this oil is now in place and being operated on a pilot project basis. The value of this resource: $150 Trillion
- Oil remains the biggest source of U.S. energy today (40%).
o Most of our oil is imported from the Middle East and the rest of OPEC (25%).
§ In 2009 the U.S. imported 9,667,000 barrels per day (51% of oil consumed).
§ Iran’s exports of oil could dry up by 2015.
§ Mexico’s oil production peaked in 2004 and now is declining by 14% a year.
§ Russia’s oil production is increasing, but may be re-nationalized.
§ Venezuela oil production has been decreasing since 2001.
o Domestic United States oil supplies about 40% of our energy.
§ In 2009 domestic production fell to 1.95 billion barrels per day.
§ Untapped U.S. reserves (oil shale, off shore, ANWR) are not being exploited due to federal environmental restrictions.
§ Majority of US offshore drilling is in central and western Gulf of Mexico.
Ø 3,200 of the roughly 3,700 offshore production platforms are in the Gulf of Mexico.
Ø These oil production platforms off the Bayou state's coasts extracts 80% of the oil and 72% of the natural gas produced in the Continental U.S., without causing a single major oil spill in over half a century of this process.
Ø Most of US refineries are in the Gulf Region also.
o EPA regulatory and environmental policy restricts the building of additional refineries.
- Despite environmental restriction coal still provides 23% of U.S. energy.
o Environmental improvements have been made in coal fired plant pollution control.
o Coal-Directed Chemical Loopback (CCDL) technology captures more than 99% of coal’s carbon dioxide emissions, virtually eliminating pollutants.
- Natural gas has become economically attractive and provides 22% of U.S. energy.
o A Gas OPEC-like cartel, composed of non-democratic nations, is emerging.
- Aging nuclear plants provide 8.5% of U.S. energy, in 2011.
o The United States has not licensed a nuclear project since 1976.
o The Tennessee Valley Authority completed two reactors in the last six years using licenses originally issued in the 1970s.
o Other major nuclear projects have been abandoned out of despair of ever gaining NRC approval.
o Inventive engineers have adapted the small modular reactors we use in our submarines since the 1950s into commercial designs.
- Nuclear reactors have been successfully generating electricity in many countries.
o South Korea started building reactors in the 1990s, and now are the world’s leading provider of this technology.
o France has 59 reactors and gets 75% of its electricity from splitting the atom, and have an excellent record of nuclear safety.
o Japan got 33% of its electric power from nuclear and was one of the most advanced countries in developing the technology.
o Russia now gets 17% of their electricity from nuclear and plan to raise it to 25% by 2030 with the construction of 38 new reactors.
o China has 27 reactors under construction with dozens more in the planning stage, and decided to commercialize the first Integral Fast Breeder Reactor that burns any kind of nuclear fuel, eliminating nuclear waste problem.
o Finland has implemented a comprehensive energy policy for nuclear energy use.
- Hydroelectric energy production provides 4.2% of our energy, in 2011.
- In 2011 the United States derived about 1.7% of its energy from new renewable conversions:
o Biomass, including ethanol, provides 2.9% of energy.
o Renewable energy sources (solar, wind, geothermal, ocean waves) generate less than 1% of energy.
o Most of the best energy producing wind power areas are located far from population centers, requiring energy transport infrastructure.
- Government subsidies distort the real total cost of energy sources:
o The direct cost of energy subsidies to taxpayers is $18.6 billion per year.
o Solar energy at $24.34 per megawatt-hour (MWh)
o Wind power at $23.37 per MWh.
o Ethanol and biofuels at $5.72 per MWh.
o Nuclear power at $1.59 per MWh.
o Hydroelectricity at $.67 per MWh.
o Coal power at $.44 per MWh.
o Gas and petroleum liquids at $.03 per MWh
o Subsidies are provided by the federal government, provide a financial benefit with an identifiable federal budget impact, and are specifically targeted at energy market segments, and include:
§ Subsidies can take on various forms: direct payments, mandates, loan guarantees, and tax gimmicks.
§ Direct cash outlays to producers and consumers;
§ “Tax expenditures that reduce the tax liability of firms or individuals who take specified actions that affect energy production”;
§ Research and development expenditures to increase or improve the “efficiency of various energy consumption, production, transformation, and end-use technologies”;
§ Loans and loan guarantees for certain energy technologies; and
§ Expenditures for electricity programs for consumers in certain geographic regions of the country.
- There is a lot of interest but little investment in new emerging technologies (hydrogen).
- U.S. electric power, in particular, is generated by a variety of sources (2006):
o Coal – 49.0%.
o Natural Gas – 20.0%.
o Nuclear – 19.4%.
o Hydroelectric – 7.0%.
o Other renewable (wind, solar, biomass, etc.) – 2.4%.
o Petroleum – 1.6%.
o Other gases - .4%.
Energy is consumed for transportation, residential, commercial, and industry needs.
- Current daily global consumption stands at around 86 million barrels.
o In 2009 the U.S. consumed 18.77 million barrels of oil per day.
o In 2009 the U.S. consumed 8,997,000 barrels per day of gasoline.
- Transportation uses 25% of all energy produced.
o 97% of all transport in the U.S. is provided by a petroleum product, either gas or diesel.
- Residential and commercial use 24% of energy.
- Industry uses 21% of energy.
- 6% of oil/gas energy output (oil/gas) is used for non energy purposes (plastics, fertilizers, etc.).
- 21% of energy input is lost during conversion to useful forms.
Nuclear energy is a viable long term source of energy
- Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 has been ineffective and will not support expanded use.
o Federal government assumed responsibility of disposing of spent nuclear fuel.
o Government policies have discouraged the resumption of nuclear reprocessing efforts.
o New plants would have to be in areas that are not currently linked with high-voltage (HV) transmission lines to major consumption centers and will require a rewiring of the country.
- A majority of Americans have been supportive of the use of nuclear energy in the United States.
o Gallup found 59% of Americans favor use of nuclear energy, with 27% strongly favoring.
o Despite no safety issues in several decades, there remain concerns about safety of nuclear power plants.
· Small modular reactors (SMRs) may offer key competitive advantage.
o In terms of safety, SMRs are much easier to handle since temperatures do not reach the same level so there is minimal chance of overheating.
o SMRs do not require huge containment structures, and some are being designed with a built-in containment.
o Modular reactors can actually be buried, which more or less eliminates the possibility that even the worst-case accident could have any serious widespread consequences.
o Modular units can be built at the factory and then shipped to the site by rail for final assembly, a huge cost saving.
o SMRs can be added in small increments, and reactors in the 50-to-150-megawatt range will allow utilities to add power as needed at acceptable costs.
o The construction of modular reactors presents the possibility that smaller nuclear "batteries" can be distributed across the electric grid, tucked into factories and urban locations, so that transmission costs can be minimized and efficient co-generation uses designed.
o Since the steam can be captured and routed to heating or industrial purposes, SMR energy use can become almost twice as efficient.
· Molten Salt Reactors (MSR) is renewable green nuclear technology.
o Initially MSR was developed as a means to power aircraft due to compact size and relative safety.
o MSR has no nuclear core or control rods and water is not needed to cool them in an emergency.
o Decommissioned nuclear warheads may be used as fuel, providing ability to recycle stockpile of spent nuclear fuel.
o When electrical demand is low, and MSR can shift gears to cost-effective electrolysis of water producing a green and renewable fuel: hydrogen.
- Nuclear fusion technology experiments are showing promise.
Renewable Energy sources are not economically viable with today’s technology.
- Spain found that for every "green job" created by the wind industry killed off 4.27 other jobs elsewhere in the Spanish economy.
· Denmark found that “no wind energy to speak of would exist if it had to compete on market terms.”
- It would take a wind farm more than 475 square miles in size to generate the same amount of electrical power and a 1000 megawatt nuclear plant.
- An area the size of Texas covered with windmills running 24 hours a day to generate enough power to meet the 2005 U.S. electricity needs.
- It would take every drop of rainfall in Ontario sitting behind a dam 200 feet high to provide 80% of the power supplied by that country’s 25 nuclear power plants.
- The entire state of Connecticut would have to be covered with solar cells and associated retrieval and transport structures just o provide power to New York City.
Ethanol is being oversold as an energy “silver bullet” solution that will not live up to expectations.
- Ethanol costs more to produce than gasoline, before the subsidies.
- Studies show amount of energy ethanol delivers are about the same as the amount to produce.
- Unintended consequence of ethanol is increasing cost of global food supplies.
- Since ethanol degrades, it must be moved at high energy costs.
- Use of corn to product ethanol is not efficient as other sources, and competes with feedstock.
Methanol may offer a renewable source.
· Methanol has been demonstrated as an automobile fuel replacement, achieving 40% better fuel economy with much lower emissions than gasoline.
· Methanol can be cheaply produced from natural gas, coal, biomass, or trash.
· Automobile flex-fuel requires passing the Open Fuel Standard (OFS) law.
Obama’s and green-energy supporters’ foray into venture capitalism ($13.6 billion) has not gone well, with many companies faltering soon after accepting federal funding (*denotes companies that have filed for bankruptcy):
- Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
- First Solar ($1.46 billion)
- SunPower ($1.2 billion)
- Solyndra ($535 million)*
- Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
- Abound Solar ($400 million)*
- Johnson Controls ($299 million)
- A123 Systems ($279 million)*
- Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
- LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
- ECOtality ($126.2 million)
- EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
- Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)
- Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
- Range Fuels ($80 million)*
- Vestas ($50 million)
- Beacon Power ($43 million)*
- Navistar ($39 million)
- Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
- Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
- Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
- Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
- Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
- Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
- Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
- Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
- Amonix ($5.9 million)
- Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
- Satcon ($3 million)*
- Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
- Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
- SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
- GreenVolts ($500,000)
Availability of energy at reasonable rates is critical to economic growth and stability.
Energy policy balance:
- Avoid costly environmental regulatory mandates that will achieve little environmental gain.
- Rely on the private sector’s research and development capabilities.
- Urge government agencies to learn from the private sector.
- Make all sources of energy within the U.S. borders accessible.
- Remove artificial constraints on the domestic energy infrastructure, including severe environmental regulations.
- Ensure that any effort to reduce reliance on foreign oil is grounded in policies that are best for the economy.
- Manage risks to critical energy infrastructure as a responsibility shared jointly by the government and the private sector,
- Establish effective risk communications for energy issues.
- Develop foreign policies that thwart the capability of coercive regimens to employ energy supplies as an economic weapon.
- Sustain access to the global marketplace.
- Discourage restrictive international regimes.
- Recognize that not all trading partners are equal.
Nuclear Power Principles
- Avoid creating dependency-based vulnerability.
- Establish technological leadership across the spectrum of military, civilian, and commercial nuclear activities.
- Assure access to the components, capabilities, and materials necessary to build, operate, and maintain America’s nuclear power plants.
- Promote free trade as a central tenet of the global nuclear industry.
- Limit subsidies to the commercial nuclear industry.
- Recognize nuclear power as a clean and abundant energy source.
- Move beyond a Yucca-only approach to spent nuclear fuel.
- Recognize that nuclear weapons are not the result of peaceful nuclear energy programs.
- Modify international nuclear regimes to better manage a global nuclear renaissance.
- Pursue nuclear power programs that make the U.S. government work better.
Short Term, Develop Comprehensive Energy Policy to allow free market to govern energy production and use.
Reduce Department of Energy budget to support only the core mission:
- Eliminate the Applied Research Programs as better performed by private industry (saving $4.03 billion).
- Reduce the Office of Science budget reducing basic research subsidies by $1.59 billion.
- Cut the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) by $350 million.
- Eliminate the Power Marketing Administrations (PMAs) subsidies, saving $85 million.
- Transfer the defense-related activities to the Department of Defense ($19B annually).
Withdraw the U.S. from the U.N. Agenda 21, freeing up U.S. land for resource development.
- Overhaul Department of Interior processes to expedite approval of leases for natural resource harvesting.
- Require any commercial exploitation include requirement to return habitat to original state.
- Revisit lands designated under Antiquities Act for applicability vs. abuse.
Eliminate all government subsidies on energy sources.
- Strive for energy independence, reducing domestic usage and foreign energy imports.
· Promote fuel diversity to allow free market, not government regulation, to determine energy winners and losers.
- Set energy transition to alternative sources expectations in terms of decades.
Remove regulatory barriers to energy production, storage, and exploitation.
- Exclude carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from the EPA purview.
o Remission EPA as economically driven Environmental Solutions Agency.
- Reject calls to drastically reduce air emissions, which would suppress needed energy production.
increase domestic energy supplies to lesson US dependence on imports and vulnerability to supply disruptions.
- Expand energy production by removing regulatory barriers:
o Employ federal funds to accelerate the development and deployment of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques.
o Remove limitations to access to untapped domestic oil/gas energy production in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).
§ Give coastal states federal royalty revenue sharing.
o Remove limitations to access to untapped domestic oil/gas energy production in ANWR.
o Exploit oil shale deposits in American West including National Parks.
o Reduce regulatory and environmental restrictions to allow new production and new refineries to be built.
o Develop and expand clean coal technologies, including carbon sequestration, gasification, and conversion to liquid fuels.
- Fast track new, safer nuclear power plants.
o Streamline the permitting schedule from four years down to two or less and should be available for up to two construction permits per reactor design.
o Amend the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to encourage development of a market-based management system for used nuclear fuel.
§ Expand the Yucca Mountain spent fuel repository to a rational, market based approach.
§ Encourage commercial reprocessing and recycling of spent nuclear fuel.
§ Create a Market for Waste Management Services to extract the Federal Government from direct participation in energy management.
o Explore small modular reactors (SMRs) and provide consistent system for permitting this advanced technology with minimum paperwork and minimum regulatory costs.
o Explore Molten Salt Reactors (MSR) technology for true renewable green nuclear energy.
Decrease energy usage with increased conservation and efficiency will complement increased production.
- Reduce energy loss from leakage, co-generation, and unneeded emission control.
- Significantly strengthen fuel efficiency standards for vehicles, construction, and appliances.
- Fund significant financial incentives for domestic production and purchase of highly fuel efficient vehicles.
Invest judiciously in emerging energy technologies.
- Establish Open Fuel Standard to increase production of Flexible Fuel Vehicles (FFV).
- Repeal and block unrealistic and overly burdensome biofuel mandates.
o Repeal corn ethanol initiative as ineffective and disruptive to the food supply.
- Invest in electric transportation alternatives as major initiative in energy program.
o Require dual fuel capability vehicles that use both electric and auxiliary gasoline engine.
o Invest in battery emerging technologies to extent the range of electric vehicles.
- Provide grants for commercialization of emerging energy technologies.
o Exploit geothermal energy as a readily available, environment friendly alternative.
Long Term, Abolish federal Department of Energy as not covered under enumerated powers.
· Eliminate Commercial Deployment and Technology Development ($3.04B).
o Eliminate the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy ($2.3B).
o Eliminate the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ($113M).
o Eliminate the Office of Fossil Energy ($428M).
o Eliminate the Office of Nuclear Energy ($178M).
· Eliminate the Office of Science ($1.42B).
o Eliminate the energy Frontier Research Centers ($120M).
o Eliminate Energy Information Hubs ($48M).
o Eliminate the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) ($121M).
o Eliminate the Basic Energy sciences ($287M).
o Eliminate Biological and Environmental Research ($456.6M).
o Eliminate Advanced Scientific Computing Research ($114M).
o Eliminate Fusion Energy Sciences ($104M).
o Eliminate High Energy Physics ($55M).
o Eliminate Nuclear Physics ($104M).
o Eliminate Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists Program ($14.5M).
· Eliminate Advanced Research Projects Agency ($350M).
· Eliminate the Power Marketing Administrations ($85M).
§ Abolish the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
§ Privatize Tennessee Valley Authority ($8.5B).
Institute for Energy Research at http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/
“An Energy Solution” by Mike Oliver and John Hospers dated October 20, 2005 published by American Enterprise at http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleID.18786/article_detail.asp .
“Correcting Mistakes of the 1990s Should Top The Energy Agenda for 2006” by Ben Lieberman dated March 20, 2006 published by The Heritage Foundation on http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/bg1921.cfm .
“Reducing U.S. Dependence on Middle Eastern Oil” by Ariel Cohen dated April 7, 2006 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Features/NationalSecurity/bg1926.cfm .
“Break the oil monopoly” by Clifford D. May dated April 27, 2006 published by Foundation for Defense of Democracies at http://www.defenddemocracy.org/in_the_media/in_the_media_show.htm?doc_id=368882 .
“Market Forces Only Cure for Oil Prices” by Robert L. Bradley Jr. dated June 6, 2006 published by The Cato Institute on http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6418 .
“Addicted to Regulation” by Pete DuPont dated June 21, 2006 published by Wall Street Journal Opinion Journal at http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pdupont/?id=110008528 .
“End Restrictions on Domestic Offshore Energy Production” by Ben Lieberman dated June 20, 2006 published by The Heritage Foundation on http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm1135.cfm .
“Running Out of Oil?” by Walter E. Williams dated July 19, 2006 published by Town Hall at http://www.townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2006/07/19/running_out_of_oil .
“Nuclear Fusion – Much Needed Recognition” by E. Ralph Hostetter dated November 28, 2006 published by American Daily at http://www.americandaily.com/article/16551 .
“Interior’s Energy Inventory: Abundant Domestic Supplies Off-Limits” by Ben Lieberman dated December 12, 2006 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://author.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm1285.cfm .
“Political Peak Oil” by Ronald Bailey dated January 5, 2007 published by Reason Online at http://www.reason.com/news/printer/117681.html .
“Very, Very Big Corn” dated January 27, 2007 published by The Wall Street Journal Opinion Journal at http://www.opinionjournal.com/weekend/hottopic/?id=110009587 .
“Econ 101: How to Reduce Gasoline Consumption” by Gary Wolfram dated January 31, 2007 published by Human Events Online at http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=19203 .
“The Secret of Viable Ethanol” by Mark Falcoff dated February 2, 2007 published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26724 .
“The Brazilian Sugarcane Ethanol Experience” by Marcus Renato Xavier dated February 15, 2007 published by Competitive Enterprise Institute by http://www.cei.org/pdf/5774.pdf .
“The Corn Threat” by Dave Juday dated February 22, 2007 published by National Review Online at http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTExMDUzNjhjNDllNzMxMjBiYTRjNDlmMjA1Y2FiMTg= .
“Energy Alarmism – The Myths That Make American Worry about Oil” by Eugene Gholz and Daryl G. Press dated April 5, 2007 published by Cato Institute at http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8161 .
“Gas OPEC: A Stealthy Cartel Emerges” by Ariel Cohen dated April 12, 2007 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm1423.cfm .
“Hot Rocks, Cool Technology” by Nick Schulz dated May/June 2007 published by American Magazine at http://www.american.com/archive/2007/may-june-magazine-contents/hot-rocks-cool-technology .
“The National Security Consequences of Oil Dependency” by Ariel Cohen dated March 22, 2007 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/hl1021.cfm .
“The Many Myths of Ethanol” by John Stossel dated May 23, 2007 published by Town Hall at http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnStossel/2007/05/23/the_many_myths_of_ethanol .
“It’s a Syn” by Jerry Taylor and Peter Van Doren dated June 121, 2007 published by National Review Online at http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YTY1NGI0YzI0NGIwODZlMzY3NjA0ODYwMDVkOWIxY2Q= .
“The Obvious Energy Answer” by Kevin Roeten dated June 26, 2007 published by American Daily at http://www.americandaily.com/article/19378 .
“Twelve Principles to Guide U.S. Energy Policy” by Stuart M. Butler and Kim R. Holmes dated June 26, 2007 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/bg2046.cfm .
“The Energy Challenge” By Alan W. Dowd dated June 27, 2007 published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=28907 .
“Keeping Our Motors Running” dated July 19, 2007 published by Investors Business Daily at http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=269738402436372 .
“Creating a Biomass” dated July 27, 2007 published by Investors Business Daily at http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=270428275645833 .
“Don’t Increase Federal Gasoline Taxes – Abolish Them” by Jerry Taylor and Peter Van Doren dated August 7, 2007 published by Cato Institute at http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8629 .
“An Energy Tax Policy for the Twenty-First Century” by Kevin A. Hassett and Gilbert E. Metcalf dated August 9, 2007 published by American Enterprise Institute at http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.26625,filter.all/pub_detail.asp .
“Just say ‘oui’ to nuclear power” by John Dyson and Matt Bennett dated September 16, 2007 published by Boston Globe at http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/09/16/just_say_oui_to_nuclear_power/ .
“The Nuclear Renaissance: Ten Principles to Guide U.S. Policy” by Jack Spencer dated September 26, 2007 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm1640.cfm .
“Time to Curb Oil Dependence” by E. Ralph Hostetter dated November 7, 2007 published by News Max at http://www.newsmax.com/hostetter/oil_dependence/2007/11/07/47469.html .
“Competitive Nuclear Energy Investment: Avoiding Past Policy Mistakes” by Jack Spencer dated November 15, 2007 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/bg2086.cfm .
“Dispelling Myths About Nuclear Energy” by Jack Spencer and Nicolas Loris dated December 3, 2007 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/bg2087.cfm .
“Myths About Breaking Our Foreign Oil Habit” by Robert Bryce dated January 13, 2008 published by Washington Post at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/10/AR2008011002452.html .
“The Clintons’ Coal-Gate” dated January 23, 2008 published by Investor’s Business Daily at http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=285982232964929 .
“America is Running Out of Electricity” by Alan Caruba dated February 10, 2008 published by American Daily at http://www.americandaily.com/article/21633 .
“The World Has Plenty of Oil” by Nansen G. Saleri dated March 4, 2008 published by The Wall Street Journal at http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB120459389654809159.html .
“Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 2008: Modernizing Spent Fuel Management in the U.S.” by Jack Spencer dated March 6, 2008 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/bg2113.cfm .
“What Finland Can Teach Us About Power” by Jack Spencer dated March 21, 2008 published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=A6DC0D72-8543-4865-962F-FEF37E6DD24A .
“Energy 2008: The Coming Economic Meltdown” by William Weronko dated April 15, 2008 published by Intellectual Conservative at http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/04/15/energy-2008-the-coming-economic-meltdown/ .
“Congress Picks a Loser” by Dana Joel Gattuso dated April 15, 2008 published by Town Hall at http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DanaJoelGattuso/2008/04/15/congress_picks_a_loser .
“More Oil Drilling, Please” by Deroy Murdock dated April 18, 2008 published by National Review Online at http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGQyNjU0MDE5NzIyMzU1MmUyYmQ0OTM2ZDE3MGE5YTc= .
“Nuclear Power Critical to Meeting President’s Greenhouse Gas Objectives” by Jack Spencer dated April 18, 2008 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGQyNjU0MDE5NzIyMzU1MmUyYmQ0OTM2ZDE3MGE5YTc= .
“The Case for Ending Ethanol Subsidies” by Diana Furchtgott-Roth dated April 22, 2008 published by The American Magazine at http://www.american.com/archive/2008/april-04-08/the-case-for-ending-ethanol-subsidies .
“Food Riots Made in the USA” by William Tucker dated April 28, 2008 published by The Weekly Standard at http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/007jlljc.asp .
“Yucca Mountain Remains Critical to Spent Nuclear Fuel Management” by Jack Spencer and Nicolas Loris dated May 1, 2008 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/upload/bg_2131.pdf .
“Ethanol, Starvation, and other Liberal Ideas” by Ross Kaminsky dated May 5, 2008 published by Human Events Online at http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26348 .
“The Biofuel Dilemma” by Ben Lieberman dated May 8, 2008 published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=22A35729-28A1-4A02-BA8A-901AEF977E4A .
“Our Hopeless Energy Policy” by Irwin M. Stelzer dated May 26, 2008 published by The weekly Standard at http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/114gmbqx.asp .
“A Simple Case of Supply and Demand?” by Ruben Bryce dated June 3, 2008 published by The American Magazine at http://www.american.com/archive/2008/june-06-08/a-simple-case-of-supply-and-demand .
“Forcing Fuel Flexibility” by Clifford D. May dated June 5, 2008 published by National Review Online at http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGIxMzViMDNjOWY0MTQ1Y2ViNzdiMDJlOWFlMzNhZWI= .
“Critics of Nuclear Power’s Costs Miss the Point” by Jack Spencer and Nick Loris dated June 18, 2008 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm1961.cfm .
“From Coal to Fuel” by Vasko Kohlmayer dated June 18, 2008 published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=481B8538-A92A-47FC-81FB-D56217D4F6B4 .
“Environmental Foolishness Has Made Nuclear Energy Radioactive” by Jack Spencer and Nick Loris dated June 23, 2008 published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=7CB5042E-316B-47CF-AEED-732382FD7948 .
“A Free-Market Approach to Managing Used Nuclear Fuel” by Jack Spencer dated June 23, 2008 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/bg2149.cfm .
“Nuclear Energy: What We Can Learn from Other Nations” by Nicolas Loris and Jack Spencer dated July 2, 2008 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm1977.cfm .
“Our Electric Future” by Andy Grove dated July/August 2008 published by The American Magazine at http://www.american.com/archive/2008/july-august-magazine-contents/our-electric-future .
“Plugging Up the Pipeline” dated July 10, 2008 published by Investor’s Business Daily at http://www.american.com/archive/2008/july-august-magazine-contents/america2019s-other-immigration-crisis .
“Indefensible Biofuels” by William Yeatman and Marlo Lewis dated July 23, 2008 published by The American Spectator at http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13571 .
“Going Nuclear” by John Perazzo dated July 24, 2008 published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=CB3F6F42-EF37-4FA3-A81E-129F2AD2296C .
“Energy Policy: Let’s Not Repeat the Mistakes of the ‘70s” by Ben Lieberman and Nicolas D. Loris dated July 28, 2008 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm2004.cfm .
“Why Is Our Oil Up Hurricane Alley?” dated September 12, 2008 published by Investor’s Business Daily at http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=306111737343456 .
“Time to Fast-track New Nuclear Reactors” by Jack Spencer dated September 15, 2008 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm2062.cfm .
“Nuclear Power Check” by Roy Innis by October 27, 2008 published by Town Hall at http://townhall.com/columnists/RoyInnis/2008/10/27/nuclear_power_check .
“What is the Independence of Ethanol? – Or, is that Even the Right Question?” by Bob Stapler dated November 8, 2008 published by Intellectual Conservative at http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/08/what-is-the-energy-independence-of-ethanol-%E2%80%93-or-is-that-even-the-right-question/ .
“Rebuilding U.S. Nuclear Industry” by Jack Spencer and Nick Loris dated November 11, 2008 published by Front Page Magazine at http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=C75FF3E1-8D4A-4749-803B-32A5A72C1842 .
“The Global Response to a Terror-Generated Energy Crisis” by William W. Beach, James Jay Carafano, Ariel Cohen, David W. Kreutzer, Karen A. Campbell, and Hopper Smith dated November 10, 2008 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/cda08-11.cfm .
“Moore’s Curse and the Great Energy Delusion” by Vaclav Smil dated November 19, 2008 published by The American Magazine at http://www.american.com/archive/2008/november-december-magazine/moore2019s-curse-and-the-great-energy-delusion .
“Measuring and reducing Americans’ Indirect Energy Use” by Kenneth P. Green and Aparna Mathur dated December 4, 2008 published by American Enterprise Institute at http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.29020,filter.all/pub_detail.asp .
“Wind Energy will be early test of Obama’s White House Staff” by Glenn R. Schleede dated December 20, 2008 published by American Thinker at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/12/wind_energy_will_be_an_early_t.html .
“Don’t Count on ‘Countless’ Green Jobs” by Max Schulz dated February 20, 2009 published by The Wall Street Journal at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123509599682529113.html .
“Support for Nuclear Energy Inches Up to New High” by Jeffrey M. Jones dated March 20, 2009 published by Gallup at http://www.gallup.com/poll/117025/Support-Nuclear-Energy-Inches-New-High.aspx .
“Three Mile Island and Chernobyl: What Went Wrong and Why Today’s Reactors Are Safe” by Jack Spencer and Nicolas D. Loris dated March 27, 2009 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm2367.cfm .
“If Not Yucca, Then Where for Waste?” by Max Schulz dated March 30, 2009 published by Investor’s Business Daily at http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=323304001162411 .
“Fuel for Thought” by Halbert Fischel dated April 27, 2009 published by The Weekly Standard at http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/397txcrk.asp .
“Offshore Oil Drilling: An Environmental Bonanza” by Humberto Fontova dated April 28, 2009 published by American Thinker at http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/04/offshore_oil_drilling_an_envir.html .
“Taking the hot air out of wind power” by Chris Bell dated July 2, 2009 published by American Thinker at http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/taking_the_hot_air_out_of_wind.html .
“So Much for ‘Energy Independence’” by Robert Bryce dated July 7, 2009 published by The Wall Street Journal at http://www.heritage.org/Research/tradeandeconomicfreedom/wm2524.cfm .
“The Green Con Job” by Dustin Chambers and Dan Ervin dated January 13, 2010 published by The American Magazine at http://www.american.com/archive/2010/january/the-green-con-job .
“Wind Energy’s Ghosts” by Andrew Walden dated February 15, 2010 published by American Thinker at http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/wind_energys_ghosts_1.html .
“The Big Wind-Power Cover-Up” dated March 12, 2010 published by Investor’s Business Daily at http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=527214 .
“Department of Energy Proposed Spending Cuts” by Chris Edwards dated May 2010 published by Downsizing Government at http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/energy/spending-cuts .
“Meeting America’s Energy and Environmental Needs” dated August 17, 2010 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/08/Meeting-America-s-Energy-and-Environmental-Needs .
“Introducing Market Forces into Nuclear Waste Management Policy” by Jack Spencer dated August 31, 2010 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Testimony/Introducing-Market-Forces-into-Nuclear-Waste-Management-Policy .
“To save the planet and the budget, cut energy off the dole” by Jeffrey Leonard dated January 14, 2011 published by The Washington Post at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/13/AR2011011304994.html .
“Here is how the ethanol subsidy is screwing Americans and corn consumers globally” by James Quinn dated January 16, 2011 published by International Business Times at http://www.ibtimes.com/art/services/print.php?articleid=101494 .
“Sen. Paul Proposes Serious Cuts” by Chris Edwards dated January 31, 2011 published by Cato Institute at http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/sen-rand-paul-proposes-serious-cuts .
“A Big Future for Small Nuclear Reactors?” by Jack Spencer and Nicholas D. Loris dated February 2, 2011 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/02/A-Big-Future-for-Small-Nuclear-Reactors.
“The Only Way Out for the American Economy” by Steve McCann dated March 4, 2011 published by American Thinker at http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/03/the_only_way_out_for_the_ameri.html .
“Oil Price Shocks and the Recession of 2011?” by Ronald Bailey dated March 8, 2011 published by Reason Magazine at http://reason.com/archives/2011/03/08/oil-price-shocks-and-the-reces .
“America’s Last Nuclear Hope” by William Tucker dated March 2011 published by The American Spectator at http://spectator.org/archives/2011/03/21/americas-last-nuclear-hope .
“Department of Energy Spending cuts: A Guide to Trimming President Obama’s 2012 Budget Request” by Nicolas D. Loris dated April 18, 2011 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/04/Department-of-Energy-Spending-Cuts-A-Guide-to-Trimming-President-Obamas-2012-Budget-Request .
“American Energy Freedom: The Basis for Economic Recovery” by Alexandra Liddy Bourne dated May 31, 2011 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2011/05/American-Energy-Freedom-The-Basis-for-Economic-Recovery .
“The American Energy Initiative” by Jack Spencer dated June 7, 2011 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Testimony/2011/06/The-American-Energy-Initiative .
“Why Free Market in Energy?” by Institute for Energy Research dated July 9, 2011 published by Canada Free Press at http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/38314 .
“Renewables Surpass Nuclear Energy: The Rest of the Story” by Institute for Energy Research dated July 12, 2011 published by Canada Free Press at http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/38419 .
“Federal Energy-Related Subsidies Have Increased 108 Percent in 3 Years; Wind Subsidies Increased 10-Fold” by Institute for Energy Research dated August 2, 2011 published by Canada Free Press at http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/39092 .
“Federal Subsidies to Solar Up 626%, Subsidies to Wind Up 946%” by Andrew Herzog and Michael W. Chapman dated August 17, 2011 published by Cybercast News Service at http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/federal-subsidies-solar-626-subsidies-wi .
“What Drives Gas Prices: Cartels, Speculators, or Supply and Demand?” by Kenneth P. Green dated August 26, 2011 published by American Enterprise Institute at http://www.aei.org/outlook/101074 .
“End Energy Subsidies, Jumpstart Tax Reform” by Dan Holler dated October 24, 2011 published by Town Hall at http://townhall.com/columnists/danholler/2011/10/24/end_energy_subsidies,_jumpstart_tax_reform .
“Renewable Green Nuclear Energy: Here, Now” by Alan Aszkler and Stephen Tauriello dated February 15, 2012 published by American Thinker at http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/renewable_green_nuclear_energy_here_now.html .
“The High Cost of Clean Energy” by Michelle Hirsch dated March 8, 2012 published by The Fiscal Times at http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2012/03/08/Green-and-Wasteful-The-High-Cost-of-CleanEnergy.aspx .
“Nuclear Since Fukushima” by William Tucker dated March 2012 published by The American Spectator at http://spectator.org/archives/2012/03/12/nuclear-since-fukushima .
“Department of Energy Budget Cuts: Time to End the Hidden Green Stimulus” dated March 23, 2012 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/department-of-energy-budget-cuts-time-to-end-the-hidden-green-stimulus .
“Unconventional Energy Meets Conventional Politics: Which Will Win?” by Steven Hayward dated May 16, 2012 published by Real Clear Markets at http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2012/05/16/unconventional_energy_meets_conventional_politics_which_will_win_99670.html .
“Legalize Methanol” by Robert Zubrin dated August 20, 2012 published by National Review Online at http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/314369/legalize-methanol-robert-zubrin .
“President Obama’s Taxpayer-Backed Green Energy Failures” by Ashe Schow dated October 18, 2012 published by The Heritage Foundation at http://blog.heritage.org/2012/10/18/president-obamas-taxpayer-backed-green-energy-failures/ .
“America’s Most Favored Industry” by Robert Bryce dated December 13, 2012 published by National Review Online at http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/335512/america-s-most-favored-industry-robert-bryce .
“Yucca Mountain: A Post-Mortem” by Adam J. White dated Fall 2012 published by The New Atlantis at http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/yucca-mountain-a-post-mortem .
“Depending on Energy, Not Energy Independent” by Kenneth P. Green dated December 17, 2012 published by The American at http://www.american.com/archive/2012/december/depending-on-energy-not-energy-independent .
“All the Coal, None of the Carbon – Almost” by Bob Beauprez dated February 25, 2013 published by Town Hall at http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/bobbeauprez/2013/02/25/all-the-coal-none-of-the-carbon-almost-n1519548 .
“Pass the Open Fuel Standard” by Robert Zubrin dated July 10, 2013 published by National Review Online at http://www.nationalreview.com/article/353030/pass-open-fuel-standard-robert-zubrin .